A phase 1 study of the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of escalating doses followed by dose expansion of the selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) selinexor in Asian patients with advanced or metastatic malignancies.

Purpose: This phase 1 study aims to evaluate the tolerability and the recommended phase 2 dose of selinexor in Asian patients with advanced or metastatic malignancies. Experimental Design: A total of 105 patients with advanced malignancies were enrolled from two sites in Singapore (National University Hospital and the National Cancer Centre, Singapore) from 24 February 2014 to 14 January 2019. We investigated four dosing schedules of selinexor in a 3 + 3 dose escalation design with an additional Phase 1b expansion cohort. Adverse events were graded with the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.03. Pharmacodynamic assessments included nuclear cytoplasmic localization of p27, XPO1 cargo proteins pre and post selinexor dosing and pharmacokinetic assessments were conducted at doses between 40 and 60 mg/m2. Results: In our Asian patient cohort, dosing at 40 mg/m2 given 2 out of 3 weeks, was the most tolerable for our patients. At this dose level, grade 3 adverse events included fatigue (8%), hyponatremia (23%), vomiting (5%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and anaemia (2%). Selinexor had a rapid oral absorption with median Tmax of 2 h and no PK accumulation after multiple doses of tested regimens. Complete responses were seen in two lymphoma patients. Partial responses were noted in three diffuse large B cell lymphomas, one Hodgkin's lymphoma and thymic carcinoma patient, respectively. Conclusion: Selinexor is tolerated by Asian patients at 40 mg/m2 twice a week given 2 out of 3 weeks. A 1-week drug holiday was needed as our patients could not tolerate the current approved continuous dosing regimens because of persistent grade 3 fatigue, anorexia and hyponatremia.

Radioembolisation with Y90-resin microspheres followed by nivolumab for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CA 209-678): a single arm, single centre, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic synergism between radiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade has been observed in preclinical models of hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to study the safety and efficacy of sequential radioembolisation with yttrium-90-resin microspheres (Y90-radioembolisation) followed by nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma not suitable for curative surgery were treated with Y90-radioembolisation followed by intravenous nivolumab 240 mg 21 days after Y90-radioembolisation and every 2 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint, assessed in the per-protocol population, was the objective response rate, determined by RECIST version 1.1, defined as the proportion of patients with a confirmed complete or partial response observed for lesions both within and outside the Y90-radioembolisation field. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03033446 and has been completed. FINDINGS: 40 patients were enrolled, of whom 36 received Y90-radioembolisation followed by nivolumab. One (3%) patient had a complete response and ten (28%) had a partial response; the objective response rate was 30·6% (95% CI 16·4-48·1). The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were pruritus (18 [50%] of 36 patients) and maculopapular rash (13 [36%]). Two (6%) patients experienced grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events: one patient had a grade 3 increase in alanine aminotransferase levels, grade 3 bilirubin increase, and grade 4 increase in aspartate aminotransferase levels, while the other had a grade 3 maculopapular rash. Five (14%) patients had a treatment-related serious adverse event (Steven-Johnson syndrome, hepatitis E infection, fever, liver abscesses, and ascites). INTERPRETATION: Y90-radioembolisation followed by nivolumab resulted in an encouraging objective response rate in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, although the activity observed was not as high as the study was powered for. This strategy should be further evaluated in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Clinic (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma that is ineligible or refractory to transarterial chemoembolisation and patients with BCLC C disease without extrahepatic spread. FUNDING: National Medical Research Council Singapore, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sirtex.

Individualized Molecular Profiling for Allocation to Clinical Trials Singapore Study-An Asian Tertiary Cancer Center Experience.

PURPOSE: Precision oncology has transformed the management of advanced cancers through implementation of advanced molecular profiling technologies to identify increasingly defined subsets of patients and match them to appropriate therapy. We report outcomes of a prospective molecular profiling study in a high-volume Asian tertiary cancer center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer were enrolled onto a prospective protocol for genomic profiling, the Individualized Molecular Profiling for Allocation to Clinical Trials Singapore study, at the National Cancer Center Singapore. Primary objective was to identify molecular biomarkers in patient's tumors for allocation to clinical trials. The study commenced in February 2012 and is ongoing, with the results of all patients who underwent multiplex next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing until December 2018 presented here. The results were discussed at a molecular tumor board where recommendations for allocation to biomarker-directed trials or targeted therapies were made. RESULTS: One thousand fifteen patients were enrolled with a median age of 58 years (range 20-83 years). Most common tumor types were lung adenocarcinoma (26%), colorectal cancer (15%), and breast cancer (12%). A total of 1,064 NGS assays were performed, on fresh tumor tissue for 369 (35%) and archival tumor tissue for 687 (65%) assays. TP53 (39%) alterations were most common, followed by EGFR (21%), KRAS (14%), and PIK3CA (10%). Of 405 NGS assays with potentially actionable alterations, 111 (27%) were allocated to a clinical trial after molecular tumor board and 20 (4.9%) were enrolled on a molecularly matched clinical trial. Gene fusions were detected in 23 of 311 (7%) patients tested, including rare fusions in new tumor types and known fusions in rare tumors. CONCLUSION: Individualized Molecular Profiling for Allocation to Clinical Trials Singapore demonstrates the feasibility of a prospective broad molecular profiling program in an Asian tertiary cancer center, with the ability to develop and adapt to a dynamic landscape of precision oncology.

Molecular Characterization and Clinical Outcomes in RET-Rearranged NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: RET rearrangements are an emerging targetable oncogenic fusion driver in NSCLC. However, the natural history of disease and activity of different classes of systemic therapy remain to be defined. Furthermore, molecular testing for RET is not yet routine, and the optimal method of testing is unclear. We present a comparative analysis of molecular profiling with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) and treatment outcomes. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of patients treated at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. Baseline demographics and treatment outcomes were collected. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were included, with a median age of 62 years (range: 25-85), 56% were women, 77% were of Chinese ethnicity, 95% had adenocarcinoma, and 69% were never smokers. RET rearrangement was detected by FISH in 30 of 34 patients (88%), NGS in 40 of 43 patients (93%), and with discordant results in seven of 13 patients (54%) tested with both methods. Of 61 patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent disease, prevalence of central nervous system metastases was 31% and 92% received palliative systemic therapy. Overall survival was prolonged in patients treated with a selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitor versus untreated patients (median 49.3 versus 15.3 mo; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06-0.40, p < 0.001). However, it was not different in patients treated with immunotherapy versus untreated patients (median 37.7 versus 49.3 mo; HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.53-3.19, p = 0.53). Overall survival was also prolonged in patients with CCDC6-RET fusion versus those with KIF5B-RET fusion (median 113.5 versus 37.7 mo; HR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.38, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In RET-rearranged NSCLC, selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is associated with improved survival outcomes, especially in patients with CCDC6-RET fusion. However, immunotherapy has poor efficacy. NGS and FISH testing methods may also result in substantial discordance.

Margetuximab plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated, HER2-positive gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CP-MGAH22-05): a single-arm, phase 1b-2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Margetuximab, a novel, investigational, Fc-engineered, anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody, is designed to more effectively potentiate innate immunity than trastuzumab. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antitumour activity of margetuximab plus pembrolizumab (an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in previously treated patients with HER2-positive gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: CP-MGAH22-05 was a single-arm, open-label, phase 1b-2 dose-escalation and cohort expansion study done at 11 academic centres in the USA and Canada and 15 centres in southeast Asia (Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore) that enrolled men and women aged 18 years or older with histologically proven, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic, HER2-positive, PD-L1-unselected gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, who had progressed after at least one previous line of therapy with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in the locally advanced unresectable or metastatic setting. In the dose-escalation phase, nine patients were treated: three received margetuximab 10 mg/kg intravenously plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks and six received the recommended phase 2 dose of margetuximab 15 mg/kg plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. An additional 86 patients were enrolled in the phase 2 cohort expansion and received the recommended phase 2 dose. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, assessed in the safety population (patients who received at least one dose of either margetuximab or pembrolizumab) and the objective response rate as assessed by the investigator according to both Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, in the response-evaluable population (patients with measurable disease at baseline and who received the recommended phase 2 dose of margetuximab and pembrolizumab). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02689284. Recruitment for the trial has completed and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Feb 11, 2016, and Oct 2, 2018, 95 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 19·9 months (IQR 10·7-23·1). The combination therapy showed acceptable safety and tolerability; there were no dose-limiting toxicities in the dose-escalation phase. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were anaemia (four [4%]) and infusion-related reactions (three [3%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in nine (9%) patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Objective responses were observed in 17 (18·48%; 95% CI 11·15-27·93) of 92 evaluable patients. INTERPRETATION: These findings serve as proof of concept of synergistic antitumour activity with the combination of an Fc-optimised anti-HER2 agent (margetuximab) along with anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade (pembrolizumab). FUNDING: MacroGenics.

Real-Time Tumor Gene Expression Profiling to Direct Gastric Cancer Chemotherapy: Proof-of-Concept "3G" Trial.

Purpose: The oxaliplatin plus S-1 and cisplatin plus S-1 regimens are interchangeably used in the management of advanced gastric cancer. The previously reported G-intestinal (G1) and G-diffuse (G2) intrinsic gene expression signatures showed promise for stratifying patients according to their tumor sensitivity to oxaliplatin or cisplatin.Experimental Design: The proof-of-concept, multicenter, open-label phase II "3G" trial was done to prospectively evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of using genomic classifiers to tailor treatment in gastric cancer. Patients' tumors were classified as "G1" or "G2" using a nearest-prediction template method, or "G3" (unclear assignment) when FDR ≥ 0.05. The first 30 patients in the "G1" cohort were assigned oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) chemotherapy; thereafter, subsequently recruited "G1" patients were treated with cisplatin plus S-1 (SP) chemotherapy. "G2" patients and "G3" patients were treated with SP and SOX chemotherapy, respectively.Results: A total of 48, 21, and 12 patients, respectively, were given "G1," "G2," and "G3" genomic assignments. Median turnaround time was 7 days (IQR, 5-9). Response rates were 44.8%, 8.3%, 26.7%, and 55.6% for the "G1-SOX," "G1-SP," "G2," "G3" cohorts, respectively; and was higher in G1 patients treated with SOX compared with SP (P = 0.033). Exploratory analyses using the genomic classifier of Lei and colleagues validated the utility of the metabolic signature as a biomarker for predicting benefit from chemotherapy (log-rank P = 0.004 for PFS), whereas the Asian Cancer Research Group classifier did not demonstrate any predictive value.Conclusions: This bench-to-bedside effort establishes a reasonable turnaround time for gene expression profiling and possible utility of genomic classifiers in gastric cancer treatment stratification. Clin Cancer Res; 24(21); 5272-81. ©2018 AACR.